As a whole international cooperation on a line And - seldom Would provide mutual advantages. As a rule, at a loss there is a younger partner: it is enough to recollect transfer of unique technology of an English fighter of a vertical take off and landing ' Harrier ' the USA which have received all complex of results of English works in exchange for insignificant modernisation of the English project.

Examples of mutually advantageous cooperation, such as project СФМ-56, is a little. Besides, the role of younger partners is quite often reduced in joint programs to performance of actually subcontract works. On the contrary, ' fair ' participation in the project of the leading partner turns around for it squandering of own technological achievements.

Besides, at development of parallel cooperation of the country And with the countries B1, Б2, Б3 the leading partner can transfer three times the same result of workings out (which value will proportionally decrease), having received in exchange three various kinds of modern technology that also will strengthen a disbalance in international cooperation.

Thus, technological efficiency of international cooperation on a line And - is rather low. On the contrary, research of the joint programs undertaken by equal partners Б1, Bit. d., leads to other conclusions.

The West European countries rather for a long time - in 50-60th years - have refused uniform financing of all directions and to those researches and development, leading on practice to useless dispersion of resources and means. The Avtarkichesky way of development has been recognised by unpromising in branches of high technology.

Really, on foreign markets where the space technics of the USA dominated, it was not necessary to count on favorable changes, having production created by this residual principle. Simultaneously and NPK between the continent countries it would be almost excluded, as partners would have nothing for an exchange.