Practice of use of intermediaries also is not alien To our business, but usually about it it becomes known in connection with any scandals. about one of them has told a weekly journal ' the Megacity-express train ' (on April, 25th, 1992, with. 9) in article ' Fight on fists against a glow of the Kuwaiti fires '. It was a question of the favourable contract from the commercial point of view on suppression of fires after the Iraq aggression. ' the favourable relation of the government of Kuwait ' Was required, - the author writes. in this connection the agreement with Al-Vazzanom, ' the outstanding Kuwaiti businessman possessing special knowledge on the Kuwaiti market and occupying outstanding position in business community ' has been signed. ' unprecedented 20% of commission fee, - it is told further in article, - spoke simply: the intermediary - a member of a royal surname also promised the contract on suppression of three chinks '. Because of default by Al-Vazzanom of any of conditions the agreement has been terminated, the contract was provided with other intermediary, however after Al-Vazzan has brought the suit in which applied for 20% from the sum of the contract concluded and executed without its participation.

Among those who considers bribes illegal or at least ' doubtful ' as a method in realisation of the international economic transactions, too there are big distinctions - especially regarding recommended measures. Concerning whom infringement is made? Whose interests appear are trampled? national tax bearers? The partner in business? Participants of the market in general? Whether the international agreements against corruption are necessary in general? If yes, whether that is practical to rely on interdictions or it is required to search for any approaches to the problem decision?