RU DE UA ES BY FR EN  
the World market

VALUE of JOINT CARRYING out of research and development. Lacks of the program of Japan

the Site Menu
  • DISTINCTION OF APPROACHES TO DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM AND STRUGGLE MEASURES
  • BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION IN RUSSIA
  • THE RUSSIAN LEGISLATION AND LABOUR MIGRATION
  • THE SITUATION IN THE WEST
  • INCOMES OF LABOUR EXPORT
  • MATERIAL STIMULATION OF MIGRANTS TO HOMECOMING
  • GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
  • ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE COUNTRY-EXPORTER OF THE LABOUR
  • THE RENT OF FOREIGN WORKERS
  • ESTIMATIONS OF EFFICIENCY OF PROGRAMS
  • FORMATION OF THE ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF DISARMAMENT
  • MIROHOZJAJSTVENNYJ THE CONVERSION CUT IN RUSSIA
  • INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFICALLY-PROIZVODSTENNAJA COOPERATION
  • ADVANTAGES OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
  • EXTRASHNEEONOMICHESKY ASPECTS
  • VALUE OF JOINT CARRYING OUT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

  •  
    ru ua es de by en fr

    you are: VALUE of JOINT CARRYING out of research and development

    In Japan where the space industry and corresponding technologies had no considerable development, the main sources for discontent were following prospective lacks of the program:

    Development of the project on the basis of the American technology of the middle of 70th years will fix backlog of a space complex of Japan which development will be still under the control of the USA; Отзывы о китайских телефонах нокиа.

    In the foreseeable future the Japanese industry cannot make up for lost time, whereas the USA where at full speed there is a working out of multi-purpose fighters (ATF and ATA) following generation, can increase rupture even more;

    For Japan exclusively profitable foreign markets of space technics will be still closed;

    Received by working out ' FSIks ' the technology cannot be used in others podotrasljah the space industry, especially outside of a space complex; свадебный лимузин цена

    Transfer of the USA some kinds of technology (in particular, manufacture RLS with the phased lattices) will deprive Japan not numerous advantages before the North American partner in a war industry.

    In the USA the criticism of the project ' FSIks ' has received an opposite orientation:

    Transfer of the newest American technology will allow Japan to create modern, independent of the control from the outside a space complex: technology Р¤-16 is transferred almost gratuitously and not compensated by acquisition of the "know-how" of some kinds of avionics;

    At refusal of the USA of participation in the project ' FSIks ' Japan would be put before a dilemma of working out of the national project or acquisition of licences in the USA as it happened in the past (Р¤-4, Р¤-15), and as shows experiment, and that, and other decision at all would not change a parity of forces in space branch;

    The received technology will allow Japan to create modern civil aircraft engineering which in the beginning of a next millenium can make an additional competition to firms ' the Boeing ' and ' the Poppy done ll-Duglas ';

    Transfer of the American space knowledge will deprive of the USA last advantages in sphere of high technology;

    Concern ' Dzheneral dajnemiks ', the received 40% of participation in a consortium, will play the subordinated role in relation to the Japanese firms.

    The Resulted opposite opinions of two parties are indicative enough for wide cooperation of unequal partners and consequently justify so detailed statement. It is possible to note, as Japanese, and the American objections in the relation ' FSIks ' have under themselves the certain bases and foretell possible failures in realisation of the program within the next two-three years, up to a complete separation between partners.