The USA the position on conversion have not defined that has been connected with their unwillingness to discuss this question at a multilateral forum. Conversations with the American politicians and scientists have shown that the administration will not be ready to contemplate a conversion problem until the congress will not take enough accurate position in this respect. In the congress where three bills on conversion while there is no sufficient support for acceptance of any of them are discussed.

The Majority of other western countries, without defining directly the position of conversion, basically concerned it with understanding and liking. The developing states basically were ready to contemplate a conversion problem, but quite often entered it in a context of interrelation of disarmament and development.

As a result of discussions the declaration has been accepted. In it it was offered to member countries to direct to the Secretary general of the United Nations the points of view on various aspects of conversion, the offer on possible actions of the United Nations in this area and to include in the agenda of 45th session of General Assembly of the United Nations the point entitled ' Conversion of military resources on the civil purposes '.

Unavailability of the USA to discuss conversion problems at a multilateral forum it was reflected in a position of their some allies on the NATO which, having considered our offer on creation in EEK the United Nations of joint working group for research of problems of conversion, have supported a priority of bilateral interaction in this area. as a result within the limits of EEK the United Nations were not possible to reach some essential progress in consideration of questions of conversion.