The French magazine ' nuvel the economist ' has stated to Lja in due time discontent so: ' It became dangerous to do business with certain American multinational corporations, especially if are mentioned ' sensitive ' questions. 123456 American press and the congress which are kept often informed by the Soviet diplomats, apparently, intend to open bases of some transaction gradually. As the number ' contracts of a century ' continuously grows and almost always they are accompanied by essential thanks; the risk of exposures increases; ' 123456

The position concerning the international fight against corruption has expressed then also Soviet Union in the note of Representation of the USSR at the United Nations from April, 29th, 1976 in connection with the request of the Secretary general of the United Nations to give the information for drawing up of the report provided by the resolution mentioned above 3514 (XXX). 123456 In the answer sustained in the spirit of ideological stamps of that time, in particular, it was told: ' Principles of relations of the Soviet organisations with foreign firms, no less than character of the property on means of production in Soviet Union, fixed in the Constitution of the USSR and other legislative guidelines, prevent occurrence of those negative consequences of activity of transnational corporations which are characteristic for host countries. Naturally therefore that in the Soviet legislation there are no special positions which would concern practice of corruption of transnational corporations '. 123456 Answer fixed a state of affairs with the legislation concerning corruption in economic sphere and unequivocally showed that the phenomena peculiar to the developed market, are ostensibly impossible in the Soviet economy. About corruption in wide supervising layers then yet did not write.