In those 70th years the question on development of the international agreement on a fight against corruption has appeared and in sight of the United Nations. On December, 15th, 1975 the General Assembly of the United Nations has accepted the resolution 3514 (XXX) under the name ' Measures against the corruption practised by transnational and other corporations, their intermediaries and other parties involved in it ' according to which United Nations in the Commission on the multinational corporation in 1976 working out of the corresponding agreement has begun.

Performances of administration of the USA and especially the initiative in diplomacy sphere have been met in the world with doubt. Katler and Drouri give of a word of one former employee of State department: ' Our trading partners have opposed the American efforts on an establishment of the international control over bribery and extortion with participation of foreign officials. some of our nearest allies said to us in a private order that in some markets payments are necessary and that their economy not so are strong to risk business loss in such markets because of reduction of payments by their companies '.

According to article quoted above in ' New York gerald tribjun ', Hans Apel who was in the seventies the Minister of Finance of Germany, has complained on ' samotek and self-damage ' in the Washington circles in connection with the American initiative to prepare any international document against corruption. and the certain not named Dutch professor of the international relations holding high posts in system of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has expressed in the same communication to the government of the USA so: ' you that, are going to export to us Uotergejt? '. obvious hint that change of a legal scale can force to consider as a crime the actions which were earlier considered normal. To accept the American standard in competitive struggle to other countries it would not be desirable.